Charlotte Tilbury Dark (7) Hollywood Flawless FilterCharlotte Tilbury Dark (7) Hollywood Flawless Filter ($44.00 for 1 oz.) is a medium-dark, orange-brown with strong, warm undertones and a soft, pearlescent luminosity. It had buildable coverage that was sheerer when mixed with base products or applied as a thin layer all-over as a primer, but it could be built more a bit as more of a medium coverage highlighter (or bronzer on my skin tone).
The consistency was lightweight, spreadable, and fluid like a gel-like primer–more emollient and wet but still had good glide over base products and bare skin. The effect as a standalone product is a luminous glow that wasn’t overtly shimmery so it did not emphasize skin texture. It worked well mixed with foundation or moisturizer for adding an all-over glowing effect. It wore nicely for nine hours as a standalone product, and it did not extend nor shorten the wear as a primer/mixed in with foundation.
FURTHER READING: Formula Overview for details on general performance and characteristics (like scent).
- Fenty Beauty Hunnie Glaze (P, $32.00) is less shimmery, darker (95% similar).
- Giorgio Armani Sun Bath (110) (P, $64.00) is less shimmery, darker, warmer (90% similar).
- Salt New York Medium (P, $16.00) is less shimmery, lighter, more muted (90% similar).
- Charlotte Tilbury Tan/Dark (6.5) (P, $44.00) is lighter, more muted, cooler (85% similar).
- Kaja Toasty (P, $24.00) is less shimmery, darker, cooler (85% similar).
- Charlotte Tilbury Tan (5.5) (P, $44.00) (80% similar).
- Salt New York Light (P, $16.00) is less shimmery, lighter, more muted (80% similar).
- Fenty Beauty Butta Biscuit (P, $32.00) (80% similar).
- Kaja Shady (P, $24.00) is less shimmery, lighter, more muted (80% similar).
- Chanel Original (P, $50.00) is less shimmery, lighter, more muted (80% similar).
Formula Overview
$44.00/1 oz. – $44.00 Per Ounce
The formula is supposed to be a “customizable complexion booster” that can be used as a primer, highlighter, or mixed with base products. The line includes seven shades, like a more typical foundation or concealer range, but they have sheerer coverage and fine pearl, so there is some flexibility, though for added luminosity (but not altering color) all-over, one would want to choose a shade closer to their actual skin tone.
It has a jumbo-sized, doe-foot applicator, which I preferred for spot highlighting and priming but isn’t as functional for mixing in with base products (compared to a pump). I find that the lighter shades look very similar when mixed with foundation or layered under it, so the shade range is more flexible than it might seem (for some skin tones).
The texture was smooth and lightweight, like a thin gel-based primer in feel, so the product easily spread across my skin for an all-over application (worn as primer, per the brand), and it made my skin look radiant. I can see one person finding that finish to look “oily,” and another person to feel like it looks beautifully glowing–it’s definitely very radiant on its own, so I’d recommend strategically applying it over bare skin, like a very diffused highlighter, or mixing it in with moisturizer if you’re someone who wants glow but not full-on dewiness.
I also liked to gently swiped the product on using the included doe-foot applicator on the high planes of my face, diffused and blended (over a greater area than I would have if using it specifically to highlight my cheekbones) and gently dabbed foundation over it. I recommend using a sheer to medium coverage foundation over something full coverage, because full coverage will work better when it’s mixed in otherwise the coverage level will tamp down the luminosity quite a bit.
As a standalone highlighter, it gave me a lit-from-within-glow that was luminous but not tacky or truly glossy, just looked dewy on my skin. It worked as well over bare skin as it did blended on top of foundation for me. On its own, it lasted well for nine hours with minimal fading and no migration as a cheek highlighter. As a primer, it seemed to help my makeup go on more smoothly but I didn’t notice any extension of wear (but no shortening either); though the brand made no claim about it extending longevity, only that it would improve the finish and give skin a glow (so I didn’t rate it down for not extending the wear).
Browse all of our Charlotte Tilbury Hollywood Flawless Filter swatches.
Ingredients
AQUA/WATER/EAU, HYDROGENATED DIDECENE, MICA, GLYCERIN, PROPANEDIOL, SQUALANE, CETYL PEG/PPG-10/1 DIMETHICONE, ISOAMYL LAURATE, HYDROGENATED STYRENE/ISOPRENE COPOLYMER, SODIUM CHLORIDE, CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE, HYDROXYACETOPHENONE, POLYGLYCERYL-4 ISOSTEARATE, 1,2-HEXANEDIOL, CAPRYLYL GLYCOL, TRISODIUM ETHYLENEDIAMINE DISUCCINATE, GLYCOSAMINOGLYCANS, HOYA LACUNOSA FLOWER EXTRACT, [+/- IRON OXIDES (CI 77491, CI 77492, CI 77499), BISMUTH OXYCHLORIDE (CI 77163), TITANIUM DIOXIDE (CI 77891)].
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer)
at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable
to the product you’re purchasing, or the brand or retailer’s website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.
 Hollywood Flawless Filter Review & Swatches){kind=link}
Recent Comments