These cases raise a critical question for the First Amendment and the future of social media: whether states can force the platforms to carry content they find hateful or objectionable.
(Image credit: Catie Dull)
Related Articles
-
Team uses AI to complete Beethoven’s unfinished masterpiece
A group of musicians and scientists have used artificial intelligence to complete one of the great what-ifs in classical...
-
Volunteer hackers form ‘IT Army’ to help Ukraine fight Russia
NPR’s Danielle Kurtzleben speaks with Dina Temple-Raston, host of the Click Here podcast, about an international effort involving hackers...
-
Elon Musk just became Twitter’s largest shareholder
The ultimate aim of Musk’s $2.9 billion share purchase is not clear. Yet in recent weeks Musk has questioned...
-
At this Virginia farm, the goats have GPS
A US farm has started equipping its goats with GPS collars so they can be fenced in electronically, with...
-
The antithesis of the Olympics: Using AI to write a fan letter
In one of Google’s Olympics ads, a dad uses AI tool Gemini to craft a fan letter from his...
-
A Drone Is Swooping In To Assist Lifeguards On Lake Michigan
Last year was a record year for drownings in Lake Michigan. A drone will now help locate swimmers in...
-
Biden Is Pressured To Take Action After Latest Ransomware Attack
NPR’s Leila Fadel talks to cybersecurity expert Dmitri Alperovitch after hundreds of companies were hit in the latest ransomware...
-
The government announced winners of a contest to tell real voices from deepfake audio
Four organizations won a FTC contest for their tools that help tell real audio clips from deepfakes. The winners’...
Recent Comments