These cases raise a critical question for the First Amendment and the future of social media: whether states can force the platforms to carry content they find hateful or objectionable.
(Image credit: Catie Dull)
Related Articles
-
TikTok available in the U.S. again after Trump vowed to pause ban on the app
TikTok is back online in the U.S. after going dark for about 14 hours. The blackout affecting 170 million...
-
New DOJ Filing: TikTok’s Owner Is ‘A Mouthpiece’ Of Chinese Communist Party
In a new court filing, the Trump administration offers its most thorough explanation to date of why it considers...
-
The Space Force is scrapping the annual fitness test in favor of wearable trackers
The new approach aims to promote overall fitness instead of focusing on specific exercises, and the devices will also...
-
-
Ex-CEO Sues Parler Over ‘Arrogant Theft,’ Claims Site Was ‘Hijacked’
John Matze, the co-founder and former CEO of Parler, has sued the site’s financier, Rebekah Mercer, over his ouster...
-
Tech Platforms Try To Limit The Taliban’s Social Media Propaganda, But Won’t Ban Them
The Taliban of today has a sophisticated social media presence. It has harnessed online platforms as a tool of...
-
-
Microsoft is retiring its once-dominant browser Internet Explorer
Microsoft says starting Wednesday it will no longer support Internet Explorer. Resources and tech support will go to Microsoft...
Recent Comments