These cases raise a critical question for the First Amendment and the future of social media: whether states can force the platforms to carry content they find hateful or objectionable.
(Image credit: Catie Dull)
Related Articles
-
A new generation is uncovering the tiny doodles left by engineers on old microchips
Engineers left these drawings as a way to sign their work. Many are puns that made them chuckle to...
-
Twitter And Facebook Limit Access To A ‘New York Post’ Story On Biden’s Son
Twitter and Facebook limited the reach of an article with unconfirmed claims about Hunter Biden. Meanwhile, experts warn that...
-
From Taiwan to technology, China ponders what’s to come under Trump 2.0
Chinese business people may be able to find creative ways to avoid U.S. tariffs, but for Beijing, its concerns...
-
How a false X post about pausing tariffs led to multi-trillion-dollar market swings
What began as a misquoted Fox News interview led to a flood of false and misleading posts on X....
-
-
Amazon says its given information from Ring cameras to police without owners’ consent
Scott Simon talks with Democratic Massachusetts Senator Ed Markey about his investigation of how Amazon shares data with law...
-
Amazon sellers say they made a good living — until Amazon figured it out
The federal government has sued Amazon for allegedly using its monopoly power to stamp out rivals. Now, some small...
-
Our Favorite Global TikToks Of 2020: From A Handwashing Dance To A Literal Ice Box
As the clock ticks farewell to a terrible, horrible, very bad year, TikTok brought moments of joy. Here’s what...
Recent Comments