In the ruling, Innocent responded that there was no suggestion in the ads that buying Innocent products would lead to a positive environmental impact. Instead, the ruling states that Innocent said the ad was a “call to action”, asking for their drinkers to join them in making changes happen, which was demonstrated by the change of leadership from the man to the otter.
Image copyright Getty Images UK government debt has risen above £2 trillion for the first time amid heavy spending...
“Over the past few weeks, as departing passenger numbers have regularly exceeded 100,000 a day, we have started to...
He has suggested changes to the Twitter Blue premium subscription service, which was launched last year in Canada and...
Prof John Edmunds, an epidemiologist from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and a government adviser on...
Roger Barker, director of policy at the Institute of Directors, said: “The Treasury must now bolster support for the...
Mr Woodward, executive vice chairman, said the Ronaldo deal, along with the signings of Raphael Varane, Jadon Sancho and...
The UK branch of Patriotic Millionaires said analysis by the Fight Inequality Alliance, the Institute for Policy Studies, Oxfam...
Kasun Kalirai feels “stuck”, struggling to sell the flat he loves, that he would never have put on the...
Recent Comments