In the ruling, Innocent responded that there was no suggestion in the ads that buying Innocent products would lead to a positive environmental impact. Instead, the ruling states that Innocent said the ad was a “call to action”, asking for their drinkers to join them in making changes happen, which was demonstrated by the change of leadership from the man to the otter.
Lockdown: ‘I’ve borrowed £4m just to remain closed’
There is one cost, however, that has come down: car hire. After spiking higher last summer as operators struggled...
Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s deal will see £236m used to upgrade the club’s training ground and Old Trafford stadium British...
“We’ve already seen this movie – how profit and growth has unfolded in the US, China, Europe and Latin...
“Yes, it costs more money,” said Brett Mendell, director of textiles manufacturer Thomas Kneale in Manchester. “But you get...
The Bank of England’s new chief economist says it will have a “live” decision on interest rates next month.
But Ms Bauerle Danzman, a professor of international studies at Indiana University, said despite US efforts to target its...
The ISU union, which represents borders, immigration and customs staff, said Border Force had been “chronically under-funded for years”...
Recent Comments