These cases raise a critical question for the First Amendment and the future of social media: whether states can force the platforms to carry content they find hateful or objectionable.
(Image credit: Catie Dull)
Related Articles
-
In a bio-engineered dystopia, ‘Vesper’ finds seeds of hope
In the sci-fi drama Vesper, the title character is a 13 year old bio-hacker who lives in a future...
-
Trump Vows To Veto Defense Bill Unless Shield For Big Tech Is Scrapped
The president wants Congress to repeal Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, a provision that provides legal...
-
Walmart Joins Microsoft In A Bid To Buy TikTok
Walmart cited a potential boost from TikTok to its online presence, including the giant retailer’s efforts to grow online...
-
Jimmy Wales: How Can Wikipedia Ensure A Safe And Shared Online Space?
Wikipedian Jake Orlowitz describes how volunteers update the world’s largest encyclopedia. And co-founder Jimmy Wales says the site must...
-
New Book Answers The Questions: Where Did Big Tech Go Wrong, And What Can We Do Next?
Lulu Garcia-Navarro speaks with Stanford University’s Jeremy Weinstein, Mehran Sahami and Rob Reich about their new book, “System Error:...
-
A new website promises better Thanksgiving dinner conversations
A new website is designed to alleviate the “Thanxiety” surrounding fraught arguments at the Thanksgiving day table by trying...
-
Twitter Relaunches Verification Check. Here’s How To Apply For One
The social media giant said it will again begin verifying certain accounts after putting the process on hold for...
-
Recent Comments