These cases raise a critical question for the First Amendment and the future of social media: whether states can force the platforms to carry content they find hateful or objectionable.
(Image credit: Catie Dull)
Related Articles
-
Crowdsourced voting fraud claims could become grist for Republican lawsuits
One hub for rumors and conspiracies about voting is X, the social media site once known as Twitter. There,...
-
-
Striking movie and TV writers worry that they will be replaced by AI
One sticking point in the Hollywood writers strike is the use of artificial intelligence. AI is already being used...
-
Volunteer hackers form ‘IT Army’ to help Ukraine fight Russia
NPR’s Danielle Kurtzleben speaks with Dina Temple-Raston, host of the Click Here podcast, about an international effort involving hackers...
-
When law enforcement wants your social media content, do data privacy laws hold up?
Nebraska law enforcement requested Facebook messages of two women being investigated for an alleged illegal abortion. NPR’s Michel Martin...
-
CES and the future of tech
NPR’s Michel Martin speaks with tech journalist John Hendel about attending the Consumer Electronics Show this year and what...
-
U.S. Cyber Agency: SolarWinds Attack Hitting Local Governments
The malware-infused SolarWinds software update, blamed on Russian state actors, appears to have infected computers more broadly than previously...
-
Emoji Use At Work? Survey Says — Thumbs Up!
A survey of 7,000 emoji users in the U.S., Europe and Asia found that emoji are not only useful...
Recent Comments