These cases raise a critical question for the First Amendment and the future of social media: whether states can force the platforms to carry content they find hateful or objectionable.
(Image credit: Catie Dull)
Related Articles
-
Broadband companies pledge to help low income families pay for high speed internet
The Biden administration is rolling out its new push to lower internet costs. But it’s hard to promote the...
-
Meta will start labeling AI-generated images on Instagram and Facebook
Meta will start labeling images created with leading artificial intelligence tools in the coming months, amid growing worries about...
-
Why Twitter is limiting the number of tweets a user can view
Twitter CEO Elon Musk said the social media platform is capping the number of tweets users can view —...
-
‘JRR Token’ is a punny name for a cryptocurrency, but Tolkien’s estate is not humored
The estate of fantasy writer J.R.R. Tolkien has successfully blocked a cryptocurrency called “JRR Token.”
-
So you got dumped… should you post your breakup deets online?
It’s cuffing season: the time of year where the weather cools down and folks look for a warm body...
-
Election software CEO is charged with allegedly giving Chinese contractors data access
The Los Angeles County district attorney alleges that the CEO of Konnech, which makes scheduling software for poll workers,...
-
Black And Latino Voters Flooded With Disinformation In Final Days Before Election
In 2016, Black voters were the top target of foreign disinformation campaigns. In 2020, there are both foreign and...
-
Facebook Gets Reprieve As Court Throws Out Major Antitrust Complaints
The decision is a blow to the Federal Trade Commission and 48 state attorneys general, who were pushing for...
Recent Comments