These cases raise a critical question for the First Amendment and the future of social media: whether states can force the platforms to carry content they find hateful or objectionable.
(Image credit: Catie Dull)
Related Articles
-
-
Hacks Are Prompting Calls For A Cyber Agreement, But Reaching One Would Be Tough
The recent ransomware attacks on U.S. industries have sparked renewed talk of an international cyber agreement that could set...
-
Farmers Are Warming Up To The Fight Against Climate Change
Several big farm groups, traditionally hostile to environmental regulations, are now working with environmental advocates in support of farmer-friendly...
-
Google to present its star witness, the company’s CEO, in landmark monopoly trial
The Justice Department has wrapped its side of the case, alleging Google used its dominance to quash rivals. Now...
-
Latest Deepfake Controversy Raises Legal And Ethical Questions In Music Industry
Deepfake technology gained notoriety after some celebrities were made to appear to say things they never said. The latest...
-
-
To help young people with #mentalhealth, researchers team up with TikTok influencers
Harvard professors wanted to flood social media with evidence-based information about conditions like anxiety and depression. So they turned...
-
How ‘Splatoon’ carved a welcoming niche in the brutal shooter game genre
Nintendo’s ‘Splatoon 3’ features cute battles with paint brushes, bathtubs, and even windshield wipers. Unlike other shooter games, Splatoon...
Recent Comments